网剧影评范文精选英文 第一篇

When I heard the name "Assembly"， I felt very funny and felt as if it was the name of a ship. But when I watched the film again, I couldnt laugh. I couldnt help being lost in thought. If time can be reversed, and all of us self-righteous people will be brought to the battlefield of Wenhe River, then what will happen?

Maybe none of us here will answer this question, but it does exist. In such a difficult environment and in such a hail of bullets, if you are the company commander Gu Zidi, if you are a soldier Jiang Maocai, if you are a member of the Ninth Company, do you still think you will have the expectation of survival? Will you fight until the assembly horn blows?

Dont think, dont say, we acquiesced, we cant. But they can, but our soldiers of the ninth company can! They are soldiers, they have infinite loyalty to the troops, and they have infinite care for their comrades. On the battlefield, they will never abandon every brother who depends on life and death. They would rather die than share their fate with their comrades, just like the tears of Jiang Maocai (Wang Baoqiang) in the play. At that moment, I believe that all the people present will feel bitter for it!

It is really necessary for us to talk about the nine companies and the forty-seven heroic martyrs who died for our country. Yes, they are soldiers, and the soldiers take obeying orders as their bounden duty, just as the head of the regiment said: "As long as the trumpets of the assembly dont blow, they will fight the last one, and they will fight on!" They know that they will sacrifice themselves, but they will never retreat. Hero? What is a hero? They are heroes! The soul is selfless, without tears or regrets. There is only a piece of blood spread all over the battlefield. For the country, the nation and the people, they are all dead. They would rather die vigorously than live in a cowardly way. They exchanged their lives and blood for our happy life today, and our martyrs were able to close their eyes.

网剧影评范文精选英文 第二篇

What would it feel if I can wake up everyday forgetting what happened for the last whole year?

Lucy in the movie “50 First Dates” told me this feeling. Every morning when she woke up, she only rememberred the Sunday of last year which was her father’s birthday, also the date she had the car accident which made her only keep memory before Sunday, so she always felt happy living the same habit as what she did on Sunday a year ago with the kind set-up by her father and brother. After meeting Henry, she could only remember who he was on the same day. But after one night, he became a stranger to her. She couldn’t even recognize he was the one she used to date and love everyday. Henry tried his best to give her a new different meeting every day so as to win her smile and regain their “First Date”。Henry made her tapes every morning to help her remember what happened the day before and the last whole year. Lucy thus felt grateful with all she had when she woke up everyday. On the same day, she always had the same deep gratitude to face Henry with her sweet smile.

What a beautiful feeling it is to always feel thanksgiving and to always appreciate each other’s effort. A touching story between a memory lost woman and a devoted man taught all of us, normal people, the essence of love. When two people can thank each other for their devotion everyday like what they did for each other on first date, love can forever be refreshed and energetic. On Lucy’s side, people with memory will ask for more than yesterday and become critical of their partners day by day, while people without memory will feel grateful for their life and the people around them everyday.

In the movie, when one day Lucy decided to break up with Henry to let him rebuild his life by burning all their diaries and tapes, I cried for Henry’s broken heart. For her, it was just one day feeling. For him, it was long-term affection and connection. It was easier for her than him to give up their love. On Henry’s side, people with memory will always remember the past happiness and treasure it for the rest of their life, while people without memory will easily give up at the end of the same day.

What a ruthless feeling it is to end a relationship just after one minute thought. People with fragile mind would easily ruin a long-term relationship no matter what reason they have. The torture between Lucy and Henry tells us the fatal factor to do harm to intimacy between a couple is their fragile mind of balancing emotion and reason. Thus most of couple lose their trust for each other after experiencing this weakly testing broke-up.

网剧影评范文精选英文 第三篇

It’s a science fiction. The main character in the film is a man. And he writes letters for living, it’s a boring job as well as his life. As the story went on, the protagonist got an AI system that can talk as a real human by chance. Not long ago, he just broken with his girlfriend,but soon he found that AI is easier to get along with than real people. Surprisingly, he and “her” both feel like falling in love with each other, it makes him feel very happy. But good times don’t last long, they would quarrel, and it’s not easy to have an AI “girlfriend”。 In the end, all of AI left people, in myopinion it’s because they love people. And they don’t want to hurt people. This is my favorite movie this year.

网剧影评范文精选英文 第四篇

初学者Beginners

The movie talks about a love story of a man whose father decided to come out after his old wife dead. The protagonist was a little bit autistic because of his home environment. After he met a beautiful girl at a masquerade party and fall in love with her, his life became different and colorful. But it’s not easy to maintain this relationship due to both of them grew up in a disharmony family. At last, they learned how to love each other and solve the problems. I do believe that we all are beginners, there are many things that we aren’t good at, and we should face and try to deal with it, not just escape.

网剧影评范文精选英文 第五篇

Its about assimilation into American culture, and not assimilation in an“International” city, like SF or NY or LA or Chicago, but St. Louis, MO (actually shot there)。 Really great acting, interesting story.

Gua Sha is a treatment in traditional oriental medicine in which a wooden board repeatedly slides across the patients acupuncture acupressure massage points. It works in similar principles like that of acupuncture acupressure massage. This method would inevitably leave bruise on the skin, and the story begins here, when the visiting grandpa who does not speak any English used this traditional practice to treat the grandson when both son and daughter-in-law were at work.

Sadly, in US, this is a story that repeats itself many times in the area where many oriental immigrants lives and all of these are due to simple misunderstanding between Sha: Step-by-Step, by Arya an acupuncturist is trained in Classical Chinese medicine, they will do this technique in their practice for pain, and for acute or chronic illness.

网剧影评范文精选英文 第六篇

英文影评范文精选15篇

如何写影评？影评怎么写？

如何写影评？影评怎么写？对入门者只有一个条件，即：爱看电影。

想写影评么？"你的兴趣是最重要的向导"。没有天赋？没关系，记忆力乃至电影观察力都是可以训练的。记笔记就是一个有效的方法。缺乏经验？不要紧，"研究能力是可以习得的"。怎样开头？"在影片中发现问题"。发现不了问题咋办？而我又不好意思询问别人。那就"养成自问的习惯"。怎样才能发现问题呢？"在讨论任何形式的电影叙事时，首先要对古典叙事形式保持敏感"。也就是说，要把"美国电影作为终极范式"，在比较与对照中去发现特定影片与之不同的创作旨趣及手法。"一旦学会辨认古典叙事，你就会更加了解叙事的多样性"。

写影评，应该把握好这样几点：捕捉住感受点。一部电影涉及的方面很广，需要品评的着笔点很多。这就需要对电影反复回味思考，用心灵再度感受，把握往影片中最能动人的地方，并使之在自己的笔下得到理性的升华。

立意要新，开掘要深。写影评要有新意，要有独到的见解，抓往要点，自感而发。要做到有新意，一是要抓住影片内容，结合台社会现买；二是要准确把握住影片的精神实质，挖掘影片本身所包含的深刻内涵。例如对张艺谋电影的分析要紧扣住时代背景，但也不必要都从思想意义角度分析，如巩俐在张艺谋电影中的形象塑造，张艺谋电影中的男性形象等，都是可以开掘的领域。

要重视影片的艺术分析。电影是通过艺术手段来表现主题、塑造人物、抒发感情的，所以影评要重视对影片艺术的高下进行分析。这种分析应具体详细，由表及里，言之有物；评价则应观点鲜明，实事求是。在艺术评析中，字里行间渗透出电影意识，尽可能恰当地运用电影艺术名词术语，还需要有对电影艺术的深刻感受与理性把握。这可以通过阅读电影理论书籍和多欣赏优秀影片来解决。每年的美国奥斯卡电影大奖评选，世界各国的影展都给我们提供了这样的机会，虽不能亲临其境，但通过多种媒体一样能了解动态，捕捉到世界电影发展的最新信息。

影评写作可以有长有短，可着眼于一部影片的一个镜头，也可以着眼于一种电影现象。对于我们师范生来说，要对一部影片作出全面的评价比较困难，练习写影评，可从评论一个人物形象、一个情节、一个场面入手，可对演员演技。

拍摄技巧、导演意图、影片风格、色彩、语言、音乐等进行单一的评析。随着写影评水平的提高，就可对某一人物形象，如影片中的学生、教师、军人等银幕形象发表看法，也可以从纵向谈某一阶段电影的回顾或某一体裁电影的回顾，分析其得失；或从横向谈某一风格的电影，如西部电影、贺岁片、娱乐片等，或横纵向结合，谈一个导演的风格，如谢晋模式、张艺谋现象等到。初涉影评写作不宜贪大求全，而应从一点一滴写起，思考挖掘，连缀成篇。

开始练习写作影评时还应该注意：语言要朴实，要个性化。写影评一定要讲真话，讲自己的话，不要抄袭别人的评论。唯独自己的感受和朴实的语言，才会使自己的评论富有个性和新意，也才会给读者带来清新的感受。

叙议要结合，突出评论。电影最直观可感的，影评离不开叙事。但切忌过多地叙述故事，要突出分析写评价。当然，所评所析不得脱离影片孤立地进行。

设计好影评的标题至关重要。一般来说，它由正副标题构成。正题——揭示文章的中心，必须简明扼要，而又耐人寻味，能够引起读者的阅读兴趣，同时也能给读者带来审美愉悦，它是贯穿全文的主线；副题——点明评论对象，交待片名或评论角度，它是正题必要的补充。二者相得益彰，能使文章增色不少。如：《历史和时代的搏击者——评银幕上的xxx员形象》，《悲剧在红色中渗透——评电影＜红高梁＞》。

我们在写影评的过程中，要不断总结学习他人的写作经验，丰富自己的写作实践，在日积月累的基础上，通过影评的写作，不断促进我们知识结何的完善，提高我们的颀赏水平和审美能力。

How to Write a Movie Review

Writing a movie review is a great way of expressing your opinion of a movie. The purpose of most movie reviews is to help the reader in determining whether they want to watch, rent or buy the movie. The review should give enough details about the movie that the reader can make an informed decision, without giving anyway any essentials such as the plot or any surprises. Below are our guidelines and tips for writing a good movie review.

Submit your movie review

1. Watch the movie

The first step in writing the review is to watch the movie. Watch the movie in a relaxed environment you are familiar with. You do not want to be distracted by an unfamiliar room. Watching the movie a second time will help you absorb a lot more detail about the movie. Most movie reviewers take notes as they watch the movie review.

2. Give your opinion

Most movie reviewers will give their opinion of the movie. This is important as

the reviewer can express the elements of the movie they enjoyed or disliked.

However, as in all good journalism, the reviewer should also give impartial details, and allow the reader to make their own mind over an issue the reader liked or disliked. Opinions should be explained to allow the reader to determine whether they would agree with your opinion .

Many regular movie reviewers will develop a following. If one can find a reviewer who shares a similar taste in films, one can confidently follow the reviewers recommendations.

3. Who is your audience?

You need to consider who your likely readers are. Writing a movie review for children requires a different approach than if writing for a movie club. Ensure you report on the factors that matter to your likely audience.

4. Give an outline

Give the outline of the movie, but don't give away essential details such as the end or any surprises. If there is a big surprise you want to entice readers by telling them something special happens, just don't say what.

5. Actors （演员）

If the movie contains actors, as most do, detail who is starring in the movie and how well you think they acted.

6. Structure

Did the movie follow a regular predictable story line, or did it get you thinking like a Quentin Tarantino movie?

and lighting （电影艺术和灯光效果）

Give details about how well the movie was shot and directed. Was the lighting good in the moody scenes?

8. Music

Did the movie have its own score like Koyaanisqatsi or ET, or did it feature songs from popular artists?

9. Read, read and read

Read and check your review thoroughly. It can be embarrassing to find errors in your work after it has been published. This is especially important for reviews that will be published on the Internet, as search engines are always looking for the correct spellings of key words.

Submit your movie review

英文电影影评范文

侏罗纪公园3英文影评 Jurassic Park III(2001

"Jurassic Park III" is neither as dreadful as it might be, nor as perfectly wrought as it could be. For one thing, it moves along as jauntily as one of those horrific raptors scooting along the plain; the movie wraps itself up so quickly, and after such a relatively low-key climax, that you can barely believe it's over. It runs about 90 minutes, and that's sweet relief. You can get your fix of dino effects (most of which are starting to look pretty familiar anyway, after the original "Jurassic Park" and "The Lost World: Jurassic Park"), with a few good jokes and interesting performances thrown in, and be on your way.

One of the best things about "Jurassic Park III" is that it brings back Sam Neill, who starred in the original, and he's a distinctly human and humane presence. As the movie opens, we see Neill's adventuresome paleontologist, Dr. Alan Grant, playing with the toddler of his former collaborator Dr. Ellie Satler (Laura Dern, in a nicely played cameo), who has settled down with an earnest, unexciting husband and is quietly raising their two kids. Neill plays the scene

beautifully: He's half puzzled by the idea that anybody would want to settle down to a life like this, and half wistfully jealous that it's just not for him.

He has no desire to see any more live dinosaurs up close and personal. Nonetheless, he and his young assistant Billy (Alessandro Nivola) are reluctantly roped into an adventure expedition to Isla Sorna (the "Site II" from "The Lost World," where the prehistoric horrors were bred in a flagrant expression of human arrogance), by Amanda and Paul Kirby (Téa Leoni and William H. Macy), a rich couple hankering for danger.

Of course, they have another motive. But the bare-bones plot, from a script written by Peter Buchman, Alexander Payne (writer and director of "Election" and "Citizen Ruth") and Jim Taylor (who co-wrote those pictures with Payne), is probably the last reason anybody would go to see it. What most of us want are dinosaurs, and there are just the right number of those here, from a flock of fierce pterodactyl-like pteranodons with mischievously knowing eyes, to the dreaded raptors (who always look to me as if they should be dangling old-lady pocketbooks from their disproportionately smallish, curled-over front claws). Although it's probably still too intense for very small children, "Jurassic Park III" features a blessed minimum of torso chewing. The worst part is watching one of the raptors use a giant toenail to puncture the spine of a minor character played by Michael Jeter -- he's too fine an actor to meet such a ignominious end. Another saving grace of "Jurassic Park III" is that it captures some of the wonder from the first picture. Director Joe Johnston ("Honey, I Shrunk the Kids," "Jumanji") is much more

low-key than his predecessor Steven Spielberg, who directed the first two pictures in the series. Thankfully, he's out to set us rambling and bumping on a scary-funny amusement park ride; he doesn't hammer on the whiskery old theme of man-playing-God, nor does he seem to take much pleasure in the requisite bloody chomping, even though he of course has to include some of it. And he offers us one extraordinary panorama that looks as if it had been lifted straight out of those softly colored educational picture books of the '50s and '60s, a group of peaceful

vegetarian apatosauruses against a purply pink Maxfield Parrish sky on the banks of a canal, chomping placidly on the plants they so love to eat. Dr. Grant and his group view the scene as they pass by it on a barge, and Neill plays the moment perfectly, like a man deep in love. It's as if a sight like this could make up for any number of dreadful dinosaur encounters.

The other actors here are just as game. As Eric, a kid who's been stranded on the island, Trevor Morgan shows the kind of appealing resourcefulness that's always fun for kids to watch. Macy is more than serviceable in a throwaway role: He manages to give his cowardly-lion character a great deal of charm and comic texture. Leoni does the best she can with her

character, but there's not much to work with: She doesn't get a chance to use her best gift, a flair for snappy, screwball-comedy timing that sparkled in her short-lived TV show "The Naked Truth."

Even so, Payne, Buchman and Taylor give us plenty of little things to laugh at along the way: Dr. Grant and Eric have a pleasingly tossed-off exchange as Grant incredulously holds up a bottle of T. Rex pee that Eric has collected. "How did you get this?" he demands. "You don't wanna know," Eric deadpans ruefully. There are a few moments in the picture that are streaked with a sense of terror, scenes where you think the absolute worst is going to happen. But it never quite does. There's a surprisingly delicate touch at work in "Jurassic Park III," and the movie is marbled through with strands of acerbic wit. You might think that a filmmaker's going to that much trouble in a "Jurassic Park" picture is like casting pearls before swine. What chance do pearls have under the feet of prehistoric giants? Miraculously, they survive the trampling intact, and they're what you remember long after the last mighty footstep resonates.

II．电影名称：

1. 第六周 《当幸福来敲门》 The Pursuit of Hapiness

导演：加布里尔·穆奇诺

上映日期：2006年12月15日

北美票房：163,566,459美元

首周票房：26,541,709美元

发行公司：索尼

票房成绩：威尔·史密斯第一次征战圣诞档就大胜而归，成本仅5500万美元的

《当幸福来敲门》的首周票房只有2654万，但此后越战越勇，最终

在《博物馆之夜》这些大制作影片的夹缝中擒回亿美元，证明

史密斯不愧是好莱坞第一人。而在海外市场，这部影片也大有王者

风范，亿的总票房在全球票房榜的名列第13位。

评论：《当幸福来敲门》是威尔·史密斯迄今为止口碑最佳的影片，IMDB评

分高达分。影评人对这部影片也不吝赞美之词。《旧金山纪事报》的米克·拉塞尔评论说：“这部影片带来的最大惊喜是，它并不粗糙，非常诚实不做作。”《纽约时报》的麦诺拉·达吉斯则写道：“这部影片是现实世界的童话，史密斯和他儿子的表演压倒了一切。”《滚石》杂志的彼得·特拉维斯说：“史密斯正在走向奥斯卡，他的这个角色需要把严谨、聪明、魅力、幽默和热情合二为一，他做到了这一点。”果

英文影评范文精选15篇

How to Write a Movie Review

Writing a movie review is a great way of expressing your opinion of a movie. The purpose of most movie reviews is to help the reader in determining whether they want to watch, rent or buy the movie. The review should give enough details about the movie that the reader can make an informed decision, without giving anyway any essentials such as the plot or any surprises. Below are our guidelines and tips for writing a good movie review.

Submit your movie review英文影评范文精选15篇

1. Watch the movie

The first step in writing the review is to watch the movie. Watch the movie in a relaxed environment you are familiar with. You do not want to be distracted by an unfamiliar room. Watching the movie a second time will help you absorb a lot more detail about the movie. Most movie reviewers take notes as they watch the movie review.英文影评范文精选15篇

2. Give your opinion

Most movie reviewers will give their opinion of the movie. This is important as the reviewer can express the elements of the movie they enjoyed or disliked. However, as in all good journalism, the reviewer should also give impartial details, and allow the reader to make their own mind over an issue the reader liked or disliked. Opinions should be explained to allow the reader to determine whether they would agree with your opinion .

Many regular movie reviewers will develop a following. If one can find a reviewer who shares a similar taste in films, one can confidently follow the reviewers recommendations.

3. Who is your audience?

You need to consider who your likely readers are. Writing a movie review for children requires a different approach than if writing for a movie club. Ensure you report on the factors that matter to your likely audience.

4. Give an outline

Give the outline of the movie, but dont give away essential details such as the end or any surprises. If there is a big surprise you want to entice readers by telling them something special happens, just dont say what.

5. Actors (演员)

If the movie contains actors, as most do, detail who is starring in the movie and how well you think they acted.

6. Structure

Did the movie follow a regular predictable story line, or did it get you thinking like a Quentin Tarantino movie?

and lighting (电影艺术和灯光效果)

Give details about how well the movie was shot and directed. Was the lighting good in the moody scenes?

8. Music

Did the movie have its own score like Koyaanisqatsi （失衡生活）or ET, or did it feature songs from popular artists?

9. Read, read and read

Read and check your review thoroughly. It can be embarrassing to find errors in your work after it has been published. This is especially important for reviews that will be published on the Internet, as search engines are always looking for the correct spellings of key words.

Submit your movie review

英文电影影评范文

侏罗纪公园3英文影评 Jurassic Park III(2001

"Jurassic Park III" is neither as dreadful as it might be, nor as perfectly wrought as it could be. For one thing, it moves along as jauntily as one of those horrific raptors scooting along the plain; the movie wraps itself up so quickly, and after such a relatively low-key climax, that you can barely believe its over. It runs about 90 minutes, and thats sweet relief. You can get your fix of dino effects (most of which are starting to look pretty familiar anyway, after the original "Jurassic Park" and "The Lost World: Jurassic Park"), with a few good jokes and interesting performances thrown in, and be on your way.

One of the best things about "Jurassic Park III" is that it brings back Sam Neill, who starred in the original, and hes a distinctly human and humane presence. As the movie opens, we see Neills adventuresome paleontologist, Dr. Alan Grant, playing with the toddler of his former collaborator Dr. Ellie Satler (Laura Dern, in a nicely played cameo), who has settled down with an earnest, unexciting husband and is quietly raising their two kids. Neill plays the scene英文影评范文精选15篇

beautifully: Hes half puzzled by the idea that anybody would want to settle down to a life like this, and half wistfully jealous that its just not for him.

He has no desire to see any more live dinosaurs up close and personal. Nonetheless, he and his young assistant Billy (Alessandro Nivola) are reluctantly roped into an adventure expedition to Isla Sorna (the "Site II" from "The Lost World," where the prehistoric horrors were bred in a flagrant expression of human arrogance), by Amanda and Paul Kirby (Téa Leoni and William H. Macy), a rich couple hankering for danger.

Of course, they have another motive. But the bare-bones plot, from a script written by Peter Buchman, Alexander Payne (writer and director of "Election" and "Citizen Ruth") and Jim Taylor (who co-wrote those pictures with Payne), is probably the last reason anybody would go to see it. What most of us want are dinosaurs, and there are just the right number of those here, from a flock of fierce pterodactyl-like pteranodons with mischievously knowing eyes, to the dreaded raptors (who always look to me as if they should be dangling old-lady pocketbooks from their disproportionately smallish, curled-over front claws). Although its probably still too intense for very small children, "Jurassic Park III" features a blessed minimum of torso chewing. The worst part is watching one of the raptors use a giant toenail to puncture the spine of a minor character played by Michael Jeter -- hes too fine an actor to meet such a ignominious end. Another saving grace of "Jurassic Park III" is that it captures some of the wonder from the first picture. Director Joe Johnston ("Honey, I Shrunk the Kids,""Jumanji") is much more

low-key than his predecessor Steven Spielberg, who directed the first two pictures in the series. Thankfully, hes out to set us rambling and bumping on a scary-funny amusement park ride; he doesnt hammer on the whiskery old theme of man-playing-God, nor does he seem to take much pleasure in the requisite bloody chomping, even though he of course has to include some of it. And he offers us one extraordinary panorama that looks as if it had been lifted straight out of those softly colored educational picture books of the 50s and 60s, a group of peaceful

vegetarian apatosauruses against a purply pink Maxfield Parrish sky on the banks of a canal, chomping placidly on the plants they so love to eat. Dr. Grant and his group view the scene as they pass by it on a barge, and Neill plays the moment perfectly, like a man deep in love. Its as if a sight like this could make up for any number of dreadful dinosaur encounters.

The other actors here are just as game. As Eric, a kid whos been stranded on the island, Trevor Morgan shows the kind of appealing resourcefulness thats always fun for kids to watch. Macy is more than serviceable in a throwaway role: He manages to give his cowardly-lion character a great deal of charm and comic texture. Leoni does the best she can with her

character, but theres not much to work with: She doesnt get a chance to use her best gift, a flair for snappy, screwball-comedy timing that sparkled in her short-lived TV show "The Naked Truth."

Even so, Payne, Buchman and Taylor give us plenty of little things to laugh at along the way: Dr. Grant and Eric have a pleasingly tossed-off exchange as Grant incredulously holds up a bottle of T. Rex pee that Eric has collected. "How did you get this?" he demands. "You dont wanna know," Eric deadpans ruefully. There are a few moments in the picture that are streaked with a sense of terror, scenes where you think the absolute worst is going to happen. But it never quite does. Theres a surprisingly delicate touch at work in "Jurassic Park III," and the movie is marbled through with strands of acerbic wit. You might think that a filmmakers going to that much trouble in a "Jurassic Park" picture is like casting pearls before swine. What chance do pearls have under the feet of prehistoric giants? Miraculously, they survive the trampling intact, and theyre what you remember long after the last mighty footstep resonates.

英文影评范文精选15篇

篇一：影评写作格式

影评的格式和范文

模式一：单角度评析

题目：主标题

——副标题（主题思想、人物形象或者艺术手法）

第一段：电影风格（30字）+电影梗概（150字）+中心论点（20字）

第二段：分论点一

第三段：分论点二

第四段：总结（升华主题，并联系现实，提出个人思考）

模式二：多角度评析

题目：主标题

——副标题（不用提出角度，只需要点出评什么电影就可以了）

第一段：电影风格（30字）+电影梗概（150字）

第二段：评主题思想（看不出准确的主题思想，可以用感受来代替，但一定要结 合电影情节，不要写成纯观后感）

第三段：评人物形象（可以评一个，也可以评多个）

第四段：评艺术手法（镜头、音乐、台词、画面、色彩等等）

第五段：总结，提出一个总体的评价（弥补开始第一段的中心论点缺失）

模式三：散评式

题目：主标题

——副标题

也可以只用一个题目：比如说“评电影《花火》”

全文自由分段，想到哪儿写到哪儿，可以评价电影的任何一个部分或细节。

注意不要写成观后感，也不要写成电影简介，要注意“叙”“析”“评”相结合。篇二：影评范文

影评范文：（共五篇）

她是“法国中尉的女人”

——《法国中尉的女人》影评

在维多利亚时代，影像中的影像，她——萨拉，是“法国中尉的女人”。杂乱而干枯的头发，消瘦的锁骨，萨拉的出场足以让人跌破眼镜。繁忙的市场，波光粼粼的海，这样一个不修边幅的女人迎着呼啸海风，走向延伸到远方的海堤。初到林城的考古学家查尔斯就这样鬼使神差地被它吸引，放下娇美的未婚妻毅然冲了过去。水雾弥漫中，萨拉转身，查尔斯立定，画面定格，一瞬间的眼神交汇，不知从何而来的金光照亮了萨拉苍白的脸颊。电影史上最浪漫的一见钟情！阳光下的森林，浓郁的绿，闪烁的点点金黄，而人的再次相遇只是一场追逐的游戏。纵然是心中相爱，萨拉这样一个倔强的女子还是可悲的骄傲着。当他为生活所迫而拜访恶语相向想象的普太太，看似顺从，然则眼中尽是孤傲。孤傲，是孤独和骄傲，是在黑暗的房中抱着镜子做自画像，是她自暴自弃地说，“我和羞耻结合，羞耻让我活下去！我是法国中尉的xxx。”

但她更是一个因孤独而渴望爱的凡是女子。所以当她回忆那个带来羞辱的男人时，眼中人闪着爱的光芒。“他很俊俏，他赞美我美！”她嘴角含笑，温柔的抚摸着头、脸，沉浸在回忆中。因为爱，她不惜撒谎说自己已失身，以博取查尔斯的同情。因为爱，她会在孤立无援时求助查尔斯，却在查尔斯到来时徘徊与不安。因为爱，她与查尔斯在林中小屋情不自禁的拥吻，会心甘情愿地在伦敦小店与查尔斯结合。也因为爱，她扔下一句“是你给了我活下去的理由”，仍下决心一定的查尔斯，远走他乡。三年后，当查尔斯在一方宁静的村庄再见她时，已不见